MicroStation: Understanding The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Why Civil Teams Struggle—and What You Can Do About It

If you work in civil or transportation design, chances are you’ve got a love-hate relationship with MicroStation. It’s one of the most powerful CAD platforms on the market, but let’s be honest—it can also be a major source of frustration when things don’t go as expected.

At 5 Factor, we work with engineering firms across Texas and beyond to untangle the mess and help teams use MicroStation the way it was meant to be used: consistently, efficiently, and in full compliance with DOT standards like TxDOT.

Here’s our take on the good, the bad, and yes—the ugly—when it comes toMicroStation. But more importantly, we’ll show you how to fix what’s broken and if you need more assistance, how we can help.

‍

The Good: What MicroStation Does Well

• Industry-Grade Power: MicroStation’s strength is in its precision and its ability to handle massive, complex infrastructure designs. It integrates cleanly with OpenRoadsDesigner and ProjectWise, making it a standard in civil workflows.
• DOT Compatibility: It’s the platform of choice for TxDOT and many other agencies, so if you're doing public-sector work, you're in the right ecosystem.‍
• Long-Term File Stability: Unlike some other CAD tools, MicroStation’s DGN format is incredibly stable—important for firms archiving and revisiting projects years later.

‍

The Bad: Where Things Start to Fall Apart

• Steep Learning Curve: MicroStation isn’t beginner-friendly. Many junior team members are thrown into projects without any formal onboarding or documentation.
• Inconsistent Use Across Teams: Without enforced standards, every designer ends up working a little differently—causing major issues in collaborative projects.
• ‍Legacy Baggage: Many firms are still relying on recycled DGNs or standards from projects, which leads to corrupt elements, display issues, and QA failures.

‍

The Ugly: When It Really Goes Off the Rails

• Rejected Submittals: A DOT rejection due to level mismanagement, incorrect symbology, or bad file references can derail timelines and hurt your firm’s reputation.
• Wasted Time in Rework: Hours spent fixing annotation scales, redoing sheets, or cleaning up references is time no one budgets for—but it happens constantly.
• No Institutional Knowledge: When experienced team members leave, they take undocumented workarounds and standards with them, leaving gaps new hires can’t fill.

‍

The Fix: Training, Templates, and the Right Support

So how do you keep the good, avoid the bad, and eliminate the ugly?

1. Create a Real Training Program

Stop relying on tribal knowledge and YouTube tutorials. Structured training—tailored to how your firm works and the standards you follow—is the fastest path to consistency. New hires should never learn MicroStation by reverse-engineering old files.

2. Enforce Standardization

From seed files and levels to plotting settings and annotation scales, your firm needs a consistent framework that mirrors DOT requirements and internal workflows.

3. Audit and Update Your Templates

Don’t reuse project files from 2016 and expect clean results. Old DGNs often carry legacy elements that conflict with current versions or agency standards.

4. Set Up Support That Actually Understands AEC

When MicroStation issues come up, generic IT support often isn’t enough. Civil teams need help from people who understand CAD workflows, file structures, and design standards—otherwise, small problems can turn into big delays.

‍

Need Help Getting MicroStation Under Control?

We’ve helped civil firms untangle messy MicroStation setups, build onboarding programs that actually work, and align workflows with DOT standards. From outdated templates to inconsistent file use, we know where teams get stuck—and how to fix it. As a certified training partner for Bentley, we focus on getting your tools running right and your team working with clarity and confidence - reach out today to learn more!